《Doing Objects in Visual Basic 2005》是Addison-Wesley出版的圖書，作者是Kurata, Deborah
基本介紹
- ISBN：9780321320490
- 作者：Kurata, Deborah
- 出版社：Addison-Wesley
- 出版時間：2007年2月
- 頁數：552
- 定價：$ 62.14
- 裝幀：Pap
內容簡介
"Doing Objects in Visual Basic 2005 is one of the few books that I've seen that lays the proper object-oriented foundation to make new Visual Basic.NET developers as well as VB6 veterans successful in moving to the .NET Framework." -Paul Ballard, President, Rochester Consulting Partnership, Inc. "Deborah Kurata's Doing Objects in Visual Basic 2005 is salvation for every progra...(展開全部) "Doing Objects in Visual Basic 2005 is one of the few books that I've seen that lays the proper object-oriented foundation to make new Visual Basic.NET developers as well as VB6 veterans successful in moving to the .NET Framework." -Paul Ballard, President, Rochester Consulting Partnership, Inc. "Deborah Kurata's Doing Objects in Visual Basic 2005 is salvation for every programmer beached on the forbidding isle of .NET object-oriented programming. 'Right this way,' she says, leading you confidently into that vaguely menacing interior. Step follows step. Suddenly the daunting and unfamiliar become doable and commonplace. You're productive again. My goodness, you're actually enjoying yourself!" -Ward Bell, V.P., Product Management, IdeaBlade, Inc. "When is comes to advice on programming objects in Visual Basic, nobody could be better qualified than Deborah Kurata. She's been doing Doing Objects since VB4, and she doesn't let us down as we move our classic VB code to the Microsoft.NET platform. From initial analysis and design, through to the final implementation, you'll find everything you need here to take on the Visual Basic 2005 development environment. This book is a must have for every VB.NET developer!" -Kel Good, MCT, MCITP, MCPD, Custom Software Development Inc., (www.customsoftware.ca) "I've long been frustrated that I couldn't recommend a book on object-oriented fundamentals in .NET. Sure, there were plenty of books on OO syntax. But what good is explanation of syntax if you don't already understand the concepts? At last, we have the successor to the Doin
